Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 11:20

Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Is using tech to track or monitor your partner’s activities a sign of love, insecurity, or control?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What is the future of artificial intelligence?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What is the future of AI and which are the best ones in 2025?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Have you ever witnessed political correctness harm someone?
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
The 2025 Bootid meteor shower peaks June 27: Here's what to expect - Space
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Study tightens King plot-based constraints on hypothetical fifth force - Phys.org